Deprecated: enshrined\svgSanitize\Exceptions\NestingException::__construct(): Implicitly marking parameter $previous as nullable is deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead in /home/sites/9a/b/b5202ae13a/public_html/wp-content/plugins/cost-calculator-builder/includes/helpers/sanitizer/Exceptions/NestingException.php on line 22

Deprecated: enshrined\svgSanitize\Exceptions\NestingException::__construct(): Implicitly marking parameter $element as nullable is deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead in /home/sites/9a/b/b5202ae13a/public_html/wp-content/plugins/cost-calculator-builder/includes/helpers/sanitizer/Exceptions/NestingException.php on line 22

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/sites/9a/b/b5202ae13a/public_html/wp-content/plugins/cost-calculator-builder/includes/helpers/sanitizer/Exceptions/NestingException.php:22) in /usr/share/php/wp-stack-cache.php on line 2088

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/sites/9a/b/b5202ae13a/public_html/wp-content/plugins/cost-calculator-builder/includes/helpers/sanitizer/Exceptions/NestingException.php:22) in /usr/share/php/wp-stack-cache.php on line 2089

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/sites/9a/b/b5202ae13a/public_html/wp-content/plugins/cost-calculator-builder/includes/helpers/sanitizer/Exceptions/NestingException.php:22) in /usr/share/php/wp-stack-cache.php on line 2090

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/sites/9a/b/b5202ae13a/public_html/wp-content/plugins/cost-calculator-builder/includes/helpers/sanitizer/Exceptions/NestingException.php:22) in /usr/share/php/wp-stack-cache.php on line 2088

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/sites/9a/b/b5202ae13a/public_html/wp-content/plugins/cost-calculator-builder/includes/helpers/sanitizer/Exceptions/NestingException.php:22) in /usr/share/php/wp-stack-cache.php on line 2089

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/sites/9a/b/b5202ae13a/public_html/wp-content/plugins/cost-calculator-builder/includes/helpers/sanitizer/Exceptions/NestingException.php:22) in /usr/share/php/wp-stack-cache.php on line 2090
Reduce Your Costs – Interview People Online
Deprecated: Function WP_Dependencies->add_data() was called with an argument that is deprecated since version 6.9.0! IE conditional comments are ignored by all supported browsers. in /home/sites/9a/b/b5202ae13a/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6260

Reduce Your Costs

What does Interviewing Cost You?

It’s the most expensive element of the recruitment process, yet few organisations have ever quantified their TRUE costs.

 

If you could find a way to deliver the very best candidates for final selection AND at the same time, cut huge chunks of time and cost out of the process, might that be of interest?

Take 2 mins to find out YOUR costs and what YOU can save!

Before you do, you may like to consider these critical facts

Time = Cost

Quality = Cost

The Number 1 objective when carrying any vacancy is to fill that position with the BEST QUALITY CANDIDATE, as quickly as possible, in order to… minimise the depth and duration of the productivity dip, reduce pressure on team mates, and secure more new business opportunities.

 

But… how many times, under that pressure, do we get it wrong and what’s the cost of a ‘bad hire’?

Time = Cost

Quality = Cost

The Number 1 objective when carrying any vacancy is to fill that position with the BEST QUALITY CANDIDATE, as quickly as possible, in order to… minimise the depth and duration of the productivity dip, reduce pressure on team mates, and secure more new business opportunities.

 

But… how many times, under that pressure, do we get it wrong and what’s the cost of a ‘bad hire’?

Time & Cost = Choice

Traditional hiring processes that feel endless and consume excessive resource have “been a long-standing issue, even pre-pandemic”, (Theresa Adams, senior knowledge advisor at the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM)).

 

Time, Resource, Logistics, account for the vast majority of interviewing costs… agreeing person specs; screening CVs, scheduling and conducting face to face interviewing, scheduling second interviews with line managers, final selection, offer letters, onboarding, and on-the-job training are just some of the steps in traditional processes.

 

Add on meeting rooms, travel and accommodation (for staff and candidates) and the wasted time of staff (including line managers) for no shows or the clearly unsuitable. So, even if we get the Quality of Final selection right first time … how long did it take, what resource was tied up, what was the lost productivity during that period, and what was the cost of lost opportunities?

 

If you could find a way to deliver the very best candidates for final selection AND at the same time, cut huge chunks of time and cost out of the process, might that be of interest?

IPOL Time Cost

Time = Cost

Quality = Cost

The Number 1 objective when carrying any vacancy is to fill that position with the BEST QUALITY CANDIDATE, as quickly as possible, in order to… minimise the depth and duration of the productivity dip, reduce pressure on team mates, and secure more new business opportunities.

 

But… how many times, under that pressure, do we get it wrong and what’s the cost of a ‘bad hire’?

IPOL Quality Cost
IPOL Time Cost Choice

Time & Cost = Choice

Traditional hiring processes that feel endless and consume excessive resource have “been a long-standing issue, even pre-pandemic”, (Theresa Adams, senior knowledge advisor at the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM)).

 

Time, Resource, Logistics, account for the vast majority of interviewing costs… agreeing person specs; screening CVs, scheduling and conducting face to face interviewing, scheduling second interviews with line managers, final selection, offer letters, onboarding, and on-the-job training are just some of the steps in traditional processes.

 

Add on meeting rooms, travel and accommodation (for staff and candidates) and the wasted time of staff (including line managers) for no shows or the clearly unsuitable. So, even if we get the Quality of Final selection right first time … how long did it take, what resource was tied up, what was the lost productivity during that period, and what was the cost of lost opportunities?

 

If you could find a way to deliver the very best candidates for final selection AND at the same time, cut huge chunks of time and cost out of the process, might that be of interest?

Take 2 mins to find out YOUR costs and what YOU can save!

COST & SAVINGS

TIME & SAVINGS

[Research shows that companies who don’t use recruiting technology will suffer the consequences. According to the 2019 Yello Recruiting Study, 54% of Gen Z candidates won’t complete an application if your recruiting methods are outdated, and 26% agree that a lack of technology throughout the hiring process would deter them from accepting a job].

Calculate Your Costs

Complete the fields to calculate your own true interviewing costs.

The Hard Costs of Interviewing

Defined as resource costs involved in a traditional process from assessing CV’s, phone interviews, first round interviews, assessment sessions, post interview note taking, selection of short list and second opinions, plus cost of meeting rooms, travel and accommodation.

See how much YOU can save

Example of actual client savings

Employers - Your Critical Factors
Average number of vacancies per year
15
Average Candidates per vacancy
20
Meeting room/Travel/Accommodation costs per year
£5000

Based on the above criteria and a standard staff cost of £50 per hour

Staff costs per candidate
(using traditional methods)
£398
Staff costs per candidate
(using IPOL platform)
£35
Staff savings per candidate
£363
Annual staff saving
£108,750

Note: this is WITHOUT calculating the ancillary costs of meeting rooms, travel and accommodation for both staff and final candidates.

Time is Money

Defined as time to hire, from advertisement to job offer.

See how much YOU can save

Example of actual client savings

Employers - Your Critical Factors
Average number of vacancies per year
15
Days spent on Travel/Accommodation/Admin
30

Based on the above criteria 

Staff time (days) per vacancy
(using traditional methods)
15
Staff time (days) per vacancy
(using IPOL platform)
2
Staff time (days) saved per vacancy
13
Annual staff days saved
191

What’s the opportunity cost of being able to use that time saved, elsewhere in the business?

Now that you have seen how much TIME & MONEY we can save you, contact us for a free, no obligation, personalised quote.